Another individual Rookie Star card from the random Number generator. I've come across quite a few players who have had multiple rookie cards but this is the first time I've had a player on three different single-player rookie cards. Deron Johnson was part of Topps "Rookie Stars of 1959" set and also had a designated rookie card in the 1961 set. Topps even re-used the same photo. ALL. THREE. TIMES.
Although he was designated as a Yankees "Rookie Star" in 1959, 1960 and 1961, he never actually played for the Yankees until September of 1960. Even then he played in just 19 games for New York in 1960 and 61 before being traded for veteran pitcher Bud Daley.
Johnson struggled in Kansas City spending most of 1962 in the minors. In 1963 he was purchased by the Reds and spent that year in the minors as well. In 1964 he returned to the big leagues and hit 21 homers for Cincinnati. In 1965 he led the league with 130 RBIs.
He came into the league as a outfielder/third baseman but spent most of his years playing first base. In 1973 when the American League adopted the designated hitter, it seemed made for him. He played most of his final years from 1973-1976 playing DH for the A's, Brewers, White Sox and Red Sox.
Deron Johnson had Topps cards cards in nearly every year from 1959-1976. He didn't have a card in 1963 when he spent the entire season in the minors. He was also missing a card in 1975. He spent most of the 1975 season with the White Sox as a DH and back up first baseman before being dealt to Boston in September. So I made this Card That Never Was to fill the void between his 1974 card with the A's and his 1976 card with the Red Sox.
"Topps even re-used the same photo. ALL. THREE. TIMES."
ReplyDeleteThat's just Topps being Topps!
Too true. So many examples of "Topps being Topps" especially when it comes to rookie cards. Wrong uniforms, airbrushed caps, wrong picture entirely, erroneous stats, bizarre bios, several rookie cards of the same player, sometimes in the same season (see 1963). I could go on...
DeleteIs it wrong to find some twisted enjoyment in all of this?